Comparison of accuracy between a conventional and two digital intraoral impression techniques

April 6, 2018

Comparison of accuracy between a conventional and two digital intraoral impression techniques

Published on 04/05/2018

previous post: Association of HLA-A*31:01 screening with the incidence of carbamazepine-induced cutaneous adverse reactions in a Japanese population
next post: SOCS1 gene therapy has antitumor effects in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells through FAK/PI3 K signaling